Faisant le constat que la dimension genr\u00e9e des violences contre partenaire intime ainsi que la question des masculinit\u00e9s constituaient un angle mort des recherches et des dispositifs de prise en charge des auteurs en France, la recherche GENVIPART avait pour objectif de d\u00e9crire ces dimensions genr\u00e9es afin de montrer qu\u2019elles peuvent servir de point d\u2019appui aux politiques judiciaires et socio-judiciaire de traitement institutionnel des auteurs de ces violences, notamment dans une perspective de r\u00e9duction des r\u00e9cidives et de pr\u00e9vention pr\u00e9coce de ces conduites. Cette recherche interdisciplinaire (droit, d\u00e9mographie, sociologie) a pour mat\u00e9riaux une relecture historique du droit et de ses inflexions, une analyse du droit et des pratiques judiciaires contemporaines et de leurs contradictions et limites, une analyse des donn\u00e9es d\u2019enqu\u00eates quantitatives en population g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, le recueil empirique et l\u2019analyse de 167 dossiers du Service P\u00e9nitentiaire d\u2019Insertion et de Probation d\u2019un d\u00e9partement, de 72 dossiers d\u2019alternative aux poursuites d\u2019un tribunal judiciaire et de 22 entretiens avec des auteurs de violence. L\u2019approche juridique montre un paradoxe : alors que pendant des mill\u00e9naires ces violences ont \u00e9t\u00e9 explicitement d\u00e9finies dans un cadre patriarcal, la d\u00e9patriarcalisation du droit a conduit \u00e0 un aveuglement au genre, alors que les violences sont demeur\u00e9es genr\u00e9es. Pour autant ce n\u2019est pas tant cet aspect qui semble poser des difficult\u00e9s pour assurer la lutte contre les violences conjugales. Ce sont bien davantage les difficult\u00e9s d\u2019articulation du droit p\u00e9nal et du droit civil, du fait de logiques et de temporalit\u00e9s diff\u00e9rentes qui peuvent \u00eatre relev\u00e9es.
Cependant, cette dimension genr\u00e9e non assum\u00e9e revient dans les dispositifs de prise en charge sous une forme invers\u00e9e : les auteurs se consid\u00e8rent victimes des violences des femmes et d\u2019un agenda m\u00e9diatique et institutionnel f\u00e9ministe. L\u2019approche d\u00e9mographique montre pourtant que cette pratique sociale essentiellement masculine est pr\u00e9sente dans tous les milieux et dans toutes les classes d\u2019\u00e2ge. Il n\u2019y a donc pas de \u00ab profil type \u00bb des auteurs de violences contre partenaire intime, m\u00eame s\u2019il existe des facteurs propices \u00e0 leur aggravation : \u00eatre peu dipl\u00f4m\u00e9, conna\u00eetre des difficult\u00e9s sociales permanentes (trajectoire sociale) ou conjoncturelles (ch\u00f4mage, arr\u00eat maladie) ; boire ou se droguer, y compris de fa\u00e7on \u00ab festive \u00bb ; \u00eatre un migrant ayant rat\u00e9 son int\u00e9gration \u00e9conomique et sociale. Il ressort de l\u2019analyse sociologique qu\u2019il existe moins une typologie \u00ab d\u2019hommes violents \u00bb qu\u2019une combinatoire de logiques d\u2019actions qui concernent potentiellement tous les hommes. La conclusion est \u00e9galement paradoxale : la violence masculine contre partenaire intime a pour ressort des masculinit\u00e9s d\u2019autant plus toutes puissantes par le recours \u00e0 la violence qu\u2019elles sont d\u00e9bord\u00e9es, contrari\u00e9es, bless\u00e9es par une perte de contr\u00f4le de soi et des relations, faisant de ce recours \u00e0 la violence le signe d\u2019une vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 face \u00e0 des normes sociales et de genre qui supposent d\u2019autres comp\u00e9tences relationnelles et d\u2019autres formes d\u2019identification que celles issues d\u2019une socialisation masculine marqu\u00e9e par son h\u00e9ritage patriarcal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Noting that the gendered dimension of intimate partner violence and the question of masculinities were a blind spot in research and in the mechanisms for dealing with perpetrators in France, the GENVIPART research aimed to describe these gendered dimensions in order to show that they can be used as a basis for judicial and socio-judicial policies for the institutional treatment of perpetrators of such violence, particularly with a view to reducing repeat offences and early prevention of such behaviour. This interdisciplinary research (law, demography, sociology) is based on a historical review of the law and its changes, an analysis of contemporary law and judicial practices and their contradictions and limitations, an analysis of quantitative survey data in the general population, the empirical collection and analysis of 167 files from the Service P\u00e9nitentiaire d’Insertion et de Probation in one departement, 72 alternative prosecution files from a judicial court and 22 interviews with perpetrators of violence. The legal approach reveals a paradox: while for thousands of years such violence was explicitly defined within a patriarchal framework, the depatriarchalisation of the law has led to a blindness to gender, while violence has remained gendered. However, it is not so much this aspect that seems to pose difficulties in combating domestic violence. Rather, it is the difficulties in linking criminal law and civil law, due to the different rationales and timeframes that can be identified. However, this unacknowledged gendered dimension reappears in the treatment systems in an inverted form: the perpetrators see themselves as victims of women’s violence and of a feminist media and institutional agenda. Yet the demographic approach shows that this essentially male social practice is present in all walks of life and in all age groups. So there is no “standard profile” for perpetrators of intimate partner violence, even if there are factors that are conducive to its escalation: having few qualifications, experiencing permanent social difficulties (social trajectory) or temporary difficulties (unemployment, sick leave); drinking or taking drugs, including “festive” drugs; being a migrant who has failed to integrate economically and socially. What emerges from the sociological analysis is that there is less a typology of “violent men” than a combination of patterns of action that potentially concern all men. The conclusion is also paradoxical: male violence against intimate partners is driven by masculinities that are all the more powerful for resorting to violence because they are overwhelmed, frustrated and wounded by a loss of control over themselves and their relationships, making this recourse to violence a sign of vulnerability in the face of social and gender norms that presuppose other relational skills and other forms of identification than those stemming from a male socialisation marked by its patriarchal heritage.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","disciplines":[114,115],"collections":[119],"publication_tag":[158,2906,2905,423],"auteurs":[2903],"class_list":["post-11136","publications","type-publications","status-publish","hentry","disciplines-droit","disciplines-sociologie","collections-rapports-de-recherche","publication_tag-genre","publication_tag-masculinite","publication_tag-violence-contre-partenaire-intime","publication_tag-violences-conjugales","auteurs-eric-mace"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n