Cette recherche propose une \u00e9tude de la d\u00e9linquance qui se d\u00e9ploie au sein des \u00e9tablissements p\u00e9nitentiaires lorsque cette d\u00e9linquance est susceptible de conduire au prononc\u00e9 de peines nouvelles qui allongent le temps d\u2019incarc\u00e9ration. Cette \u00ab d\u00e9linquance carc\u00e9rale \u00bb correspond \u00e0 un ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne bien connu des professionnels du milieu p\u00e9nitentiaire mais peu document\u00e9 et jusqu\u2019alors d\u00e9laiss\u00e9 par les chercheurs. Ce travail de recherche men\u00e9 par une \u00e9quipe pluridisciplinaire offre un regard pluriel sur le ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne, \u00e0 la rencontre du droit, de la sociologie et de la psychologie. Outre la recension de la litt\u00e9rature pertinente dans les trois champs disciplinaires, la m\u00e9thodologie a consist\u00e9 en la r\u00e9alisation d\u2019entretiens, plus ou moins formalis\u00e9s en fonction de leur objet, avec des acteurs du terrain, essentiellement au sein de l\u2019administration p\u00e9nitentiaire et de l\u2019institution judiciaire. Une autorisation d\u2019acc\u00e8s a \u00e9t\u00e9 accord\u00e9e par la direction de l\u2019administration p\u00e9nitentiaire pour plusieurs \u00e9tablissements relevant de trois directions interr\u00e9gionales (Ile de France, Ouest, Nord). Les enjeux de la d\u00e9linquance carc\u00e9rale sont nombreux et importants, notamment en termes de pr\u00e9vention des violences, de gestion de la d\u00e9tention ou de conditions d\u2019intervention de l\u2019autorit\u00e9 judiciaire. Administration p\u00e9nitentiaire, services de sant\u00e9, Minist\u00e8re public, juges de l\u2019application des peines, juges des juridictions p\u00e9nales : tous ces acteurs sont mobilis\u00e9s pour r\u00e9agir \u00e0 cette d\u00e9linquance particuli\u00e8re. Ainsi, la co\u00efncidence entre infractions disciplinaires et infractions p\u00e9nales peut parfois conduire \u00e0 de multiples r\u00e9actions en cons\u00e9quence d\u2019un m\u00eame comportement, toutes concourant \u00e0 allonger le temps d\u2019incarc\u00e9ration. Il peut s\u2019agir, du c\u00f4t\u00e9 de l\u2019administration p\u00e9nitentiaire, d\u2019une sanction disciplinaire, de l\u2019affectation vers un r\u00e9gime de d\u00e9tention plus strict, voire un transfert vers un autre \u00e9tablissement ; le juge d\u2019application des peines pourra quant \u00e0 lui refuser une permission de sortir, une r\u00e9duction de peine ou encore un am\u00e9nagement de peine. Cette configuration originale des r\u00e9actions institutionnelles peut s\u2019apparenter \u00e0 un cumul des m\u00e9canismes r\u00e9pressifs susceptibles de r\u00e9v\u00e9ler les limites du syst\u00e8me p\u00e9nal : respect du principe non bis in idem, proportionnalit\u00e9 de la r\u00e9pression mais plus largement aussi, sens de la peine et fonction de la privation de libert\u00e9 carc\u00e9rale. Toutes les disciplines engag\u00e9es dans cette recherche imposaient un s\u00e9quen\u00e7age de la recherche sur le fond en deux temps : il importait de comprendre la mani\u00e8re dont l\u2019institution carc\u00e9rale elle-m\u00eame appr\u00e9hende les infractions commises en d\u00e9tention, avant d\u2019envisager leur traitement par le syst\u00e8me judiciaire. Ont \u00e9t\u00e9 observ\u00e9es en mati\u00e8re p\u00e9nitentiaire comme en mati\u00e8re judiciaire des limites et des paradoxes dans la prise en charge de cette d\u00e9linquance, permettant de mettre en lumi\u00e8re le sentiment d\u2019impasse auquel sont souvent confront\u00e9s les acteurs concern\u00e9s.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Prison Delinquency through Internal Sentences This research proposes a study of the delinquency which occurs within penitentiary establishments when this delinquency is likely to lead to the imposition of new sentences which lengthen the time of incarceration. This \u201cprison delinquency\u201d corresponds to a phenomenon well known to prison professionals but poorly documented and until now neglected by researchers. This research work carried out by a multidisciplinary team offers a plural perspective on the phenomenon, at the intersection of law, sociology and psychology. In addition to the review of the relevant literature in the three disciplinary fields, the methodology consisted of carrying out interviews, more or less formalized depending on their subject, with actors in the field, mainly within the prison administration and the judicial institution. Access authorization was granted by the prison administration direction for several establishments belonging to three interregional directorates (Ile de France, West and North). The challenges of prison delinquency are numerous and important, particularly in terms of prevention of violence, management of detention or conditions of intervention by the judicial authority. Prison administration, health services, public prosecutor, sentencing judges, criminal court judges: all these actors are mobilized to react to this particular delinquency. The challenges of prison delinquency are numerous and important, particularly in terms of prevention of violence, management of detention or conditions of intervention by the judicial authority. Prison administration, health services, public prosecutor, sentencing judges, criminal court judges: all these actors are mobilized to react to this particular delinquency. Thus, the coincidence between disciplinary offenses and criminal offenses can sometimes lead to multiple reactions as a result of the same behavior, all contributing to lengthening the time of incarceration. For the prison administration, this may involve a disciplinary sanction, assignment to a stricter detention regime, or even a transfer to another establishment; the sentence enforcement judge may refuse a temporary absence, a sentence reduction or even a sentence adjustment. This original configuration of institutional reactions can be compared to an accumulation of repressive mechanisms likely to reveal the limits of the penal system: respect of the principle non bis in idem, proportionality of repression but also more broadly, the meaning of the sentence and the function of the deprivation of prison liberty. All the disciplines involved in this research required a sequencing of the research in two stages: it was important to understand the way in which the prison institution itself approaches offenses committed in detention, before considering their treatment by the system judicial. Limits and paradoxes in the management of this delinquency were observed in penitentiary system as in judicial system, making it possible to highlight the feeling of impasse which the actors concerned are often confronted with<\/p>\n<\/details>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","disciplines":[114,375,115],"collections":[119],"publication_tag":[58,2927,2926,2925,638,2913],"auteurs":[2893,2928],"class_list":["post-11578","publications","type-publications","status-publish","hentry","disciplines-droit","disciplines-psychologie","disciplines-sociologie","collections-rapports-de-recherche","publication_tag-delinquance","publication_tag-delinquance-carcerale","publication_tag-discipline","publication_tag-peine","publication_tag-prison","publication_tag-sanction-disciplinaire","auteurs-anne-simon","auteurs-isabelle-fouchard"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n